See also:
- Women’s honorable mentions
- Women’s classes #13-16
- Women’s classes #9-12
- Women’s classes #5-8
- Women’s classes #1-4
- Men’s honorable mentions
- Men’s classes #13-16
- Men’s classes #9-12
- Men’s classes #5-8
- Individual recruit rankings – Girls final rankings (April 2020)
- Individual recruit rankings – Boys final rankings (April 2020)
We continue our spring recruiting series with a team-by-team look at the best recruiting classes entering the NCAA next season. The classes below are projected freshmen for the 2020-2021 season. Of course, the coronavirus pandemic presents a number of wrinkles to this analysis: some athletes didn’t get a senior-year taper meet. Some high-end recruits may opt to defer their enrollment for a year to prepare for the Tokyo Olympics. There’s also still the possibility that the 2020-2021 school year is delayed, along with NCAA sports. All things considered, these ranks are based on the 2020-2021 NCAA season happening, but as we usually view these recruiting classes over their projected four years of college swimming, a potential delay or cancellation of the upcoming season doesn’t have as big an impact on this analysis as it would seem.
A few important notes on our rankings:
- The rankings listed are based on our Class of 2020 Re-Rank from just last month. “HM” refers to our honorable mentions.
- Like most of our rankings, these placements are subjective. We base our team ranks on a number of factors: prospects’ incoming times are by far the main factor, but we also consider potential upside in the class, class size, relay impact and team needs filled. Greater weight is placed on known success in short course yards, so foreign swimmers are slightly devalued based on the difficulty in converting long course times to short course production.
- Transfers are included.
- For the full list of all verbally committed athletes, click here. A big thank-you to SwimSwam’s own Anne Lepesant for compiling that index – without it, rankings like these would be far less comprehensive.
Previously ranked:
- #16: Texas A&M Aggies
- #15: Tennessee Volunteers
- #14: Auburn Tigers
- #13: Indiana Hoosiers
- #12: Florida Gators
- #11: Notre Dame
- #10: USC Trojans
- #9: Virginia Cavaliers
- #8: Alabama Crimson Tide
- #7: Ohio State Buckeyes
- #6: Georgia Bulldogs
- #5: Michigan Wolverines
#4: Cal Golden Bears
- Top-tier additions: #5 Destin Lasco (NJ – back/IM), #17 Forrest Frazier (IA – breast), Bjorn Seeliger (Sweden – free), HM Dare Rose (NJ – free/fly), Matthew Jensen (PA – fly/free), Tyler Kopp (TX- distance), Dylan Hawk (CA – free)
- The rest: Jack Meehan (NC – breast)
Cal loads up yet again with a strong domestic recruiting class, capped with one key international. The Golden Bears add Destin Lasco to their backstroke factory. 45.9 and 1:40.7 out of high school, Lasco follows in the footsteps of a long line of top Cal backstrokers. He’ll overlap one year with current standouts Daniel Carr and Bryce Mefford. Lasco is also 1:44.5 in the IM and 1:35.1 in the 200 free, and should find plenty of ways to contribute to relays across his career.
One of the team’s top sprinters, Pawel Sendyk, is graduated, but Cal reloads with Sweden’s Bjorn Seeliger, an elite long course talent with times of 22.2 and 49.5 in meters. Roughly converted, that should put Seeliger around the 19.2 range it took to earn an NCAA invite last year, and his 100 is probably on the cusp of the 43-second barrier. Seeliger is also a 55-second backstroker in long course and could jump onto multiple relays.
Forrest Frazier joins a strong breaststroking tradition. He’s 52.5 and 1:55.3 out of high school, with a 1:45.9 IM to add as well.
Dare Rose out of New Jersey is an intriguing addition. He’s an elite long course swimmer (53.9 and 1:58.9 in butterfly, plus 3:51 and 1:49 in free) who hasn’t yet transferred that kind of production to short course yards. If Cal can bring around his short course times, though, Rose has ability to be one of the top 10 domestic talents in this entire recruiting class.
The Golden Bears graduate sprinter Michael Jensen but bring in his younger brother Matthew Jensen, a breakout star in Pennsylvania’s abbreviated high school state meet. Matthew is 46.5 in butterfly and 1:46.3 in IM, and rising fast. Dylan Hawk (44.5/1:36.0 free) could be a relay contributor down the road, and Tyler Kopp is an interesting free/IM hybrid in the mold of current standout Sean Grieshop, who also left the state of Texas for Berkeley as a recruit. Kopp is 15:08 in the mile and 3:48.8 in the IM.
#3: NC State Wolfpack
- Top-tier additions: #11 Luke Miller (CO – free/fly), Alexander Norgaard (Denmark – distance), Kacper Stokowski (Florida transfer – back/fly), James Plage (CT – distance), Michael Moore (NC – IM), Conall Monahan (NC – IM), Cameron Karkoska (LSU transfer – breast)
- The rest: Alex Tomlinson (NC – back), Austin Winchester (NC – free), Nick Lawson (VA – distance), Owen Lloyd (NC – distance), Matt McDonald (MA – free), Matt Sexton (MD – diving)
Another outstanding class coming in the door for NC State, whose stellar freshman class from a year ago didn’t get to show their full range in a COVID-shortened season. Former Florida freshman All-American Kacper Stokowski is still on track to make his NC State debut this season, the team says. The 44.9/1:41.3 backstroker is a massive weapon, and should still have three years of eligibility remaining. He’s also 45.7 in fly.
Luke Miller is an absolutely massive recruit, more than a #11 overall ranking should indicate. He’s 1:33.4 in the 200 free, which already would have been the second-best split on NC State’s 800 free relay at 2020 ACCs. That relay graduates both of its 1:33 legs, so Miller will be a valuable piece to help rebuild.
Miller is also 43.5 in the 100 free and 47.1/1:46.5 in butterfly, which should give him plenty of event options individually.
The Wolfpack also bolsters its distance group. Denmark’s Alexander Norgaard might just be the best distance prospect entering the NCAA this year. He’s an incredible 14:47 in the long course 1500 free and 7:52 in the 800. Long-course-to-short-course conversions are notoriously tricky, but some converters put that in the 14:30-range in short course yards – which would have been a top-3 time at NCAAs in 2019. Put another way, the top domestic distance swimmer in this recruiting class is Jake Magahey, who is 14:51 in short course and 15:24 in long course. Norgaard is 37 seconds faster in long course meters, which gives some frame of reference to how good he could be in the NCAA mile. One more rough attempt to contextualize: Norgaard’s long course meters time is a tick faster than 2020 NCAA record-setter Bobby Finke (14:48.70), who is still the clear-cut favorite to win next year’s NCAA title.
James Plage (14:57/4:23) is another great distance swimmer, from within the U.S. And NC State builds up its IM group with 3:48.9/1:47.8 Michael Moore and 3:49.4/1:48.7 Conall Monahan, both from North Carolina.
Note: we don’t include returning redshirts who previously competed for the program, but NC State will also get 19.2/42.6 sprinter Giovanni Izzo back from an Olympic gap year.
#2: Stanford Cardinal
- Top-tier additions: Andrei Minakov (Russia – fly/free), #8 Ethan Hu (CA – fly/IM), #14 Luke Maurer (IL – free), #15 Rick Mihm (PA – IM/free), #18 Ethan Dang (WA – breast/free), #20 Jonathan Affeld (CA – IM), HM Preston Forst (NC – fly), Aaron Sequeira (OH – back), Hunter Hollenbeck (MI – diving)
- The rest: none
As on the women’s side, the top two classes are in a field of their own, and almost interchangeable as the #1 and #2 classes. This is an incredible Stanford group, with five top-20 prospects and perhaps the best international pickup of any team in the NCAA.
Let’s start internationally. Andrei Minakov is a World Champs silver medalist, one of the top sprint flyers in the world, and decided to avoid the ISL to keep his collegiate eligibility. The Russian Minakov is a blazing 50.8 in the 100-meter butterfly, converting to somewhere in the 44s in short course yards. Only four swimmers in the NCAA final went 44s in 2019, and none will be around by this coming year. Minakov is also 48.5 and 22.7 in long course freestyle, converting to something like 19.7 and 42.2. That’s immediate-impact stuff.
He joins #8 domestic recruit Ethan Hu, also an elite flyer. Hu is 45.6 and 1:43.6 in short course, with a 1:44.6 IM and a shot to score as an NCAA rookie. Honorable mention recruit Preston Forst (1:43.5/47.4) will make it a big-time fly trio.
Between Minakov and Illinois standout Luke Maurer (1:34.4/43.9/20.2), Stanford should get a lot of pieces to help rebuild their relays, which have dropped off badly. And this class also brings in top-level talents in breaststroke (52.7/1:55.2 Ethan Dang, a longtime age group standout) and backstroke (Aaron Sequeira out of Ohio is 46.7 and 1:44.1 in backstroke, plus 19.9 in free).
Jonathan Affeld is a fast-rising and very versatile prospect, who could choose a number of different event paths. He’s 1:45.3 and 3:49.0 as an IMer, but also 46.9/1:44.0 in fly, and has some absurd freestyle range, from 44.0/1:36.0 to 4:21.0/15:12. If he does continue with the IMs, he’ll join training partner Rick Mihm, who is a rare 1:43.9 out of high school with solid sprint frees to potentially bolster relays.
Toss in Michigan dive product Hunter Hollenbeck, and this is a nine-man class that could see scorers in just about every event early in their NCAA careers. For new head coach Dan Schemmel, the transition in year 2 couldn’t be set up any better.
#1: Texas Longhorns
- Top-tier additions: #1 Carson Foster (OH – IM/back), #10 Coby Carrozza (TX – free), #12 Ethan Heasley (OR – IM/distance), #16 David Johnston (TX – distance), Zac van Zandt (CA – breast/fly), Matthew Tannenberger (TX – distance), Noah Duperre (OH – diving), Laurent Gosselin-Paradis (Canada – diving)
- The rest: Armando Vegas (CA – fly), Ben Charles (VA – fly), Brendan McCourt (PA – diving), Victor Tremblay (TX – free)
This Texas group is as good a class as Texas has had recently, and that’s saying something. #1 overall recruit Carson Foster is one of the best high school IMers in history, going 3:38.6 in the 400 IM and 1:42.4 in the 200. He’s also 1:40.0 and 46.2 in backstroke, and adds yet another elite 200 freestyler (1:32.9) to Texas’s gigantic stockpile of talent in that event.
There are three more ranked domestic recruits. #10 Coby Carrozza is a 1:34.3/4:14.9 freestyler who fits that Texas mold perfectly. He’s got a lot of versatility beyond those two races, and could develop as a backstroker (he’s 1:45.5 and 48.8 now), IMer (1:47/3:49) or butterflyer (1:44.2). A 43.5 in the 100 free should also make him a relay candidate down the road.
#12 Ethan Heasley is more of a distance freestyler and IMer. He’s 3:44.2 in the 400 IM, which would probably stand out more in a class that didn’t have someone as game-breaking as Foster at the top. For what it’s worth, it took 3:44.3 to earn an NCAA invite last year and 3:42.7 to score at NCAAs in 2019. Heasley is also 15:03 in the mile and 4:17.5 in the 500.
Coach Eddie Reese pulled a lot of distance talent out of the state of Texas. David Johnston is a fast-rising miler, 14:51 with the best 1650 time of any high school senior in the nation. Matthew Tannenberger is 15:35 and 4:21.
Meanwhile Zac van Zandt has an intriguing breast/fly combo skillset. He’s 53.1 in breaststroke and 46.6 in butterfly, and that has to suggest he could develop into a strong IMer. He’s 1:47.8 there right now.
Texas generally does very well with divers – without the benefit of times, it can be hard to project exactly how a diver fits in the NCAA, but if you rate the three new Longhorn divers as NCAA scoring types, then this could be a pretty incredible class.
Ohio’s Noah Duperre is a clear high-impact recruit. He’s competed at three straight Junior Pan Ams and was selected as the 2018 national high school diving champion. Texas also went to Pennsylvania to get state champion diver Brendan McCourt, and the school has confirmed it also signed Canadian national teamer Laurent Gosselin-Paradis, a relatively recent crossover from gymnastics who won two bronze medals at the 2019 World University Games. Gosselin-Paradis will join Texas in January of 2021.
As ridiculous as Foster is (I’m betting to see him in Tokyo), at Texas I see him on 1, potentially 2 relays as a freshman. His current best 100 free and back would have been 8th on the Longhorns roster in 2020.
And those Minakov conversions are conservative. There are way 44 scy flyers than 50-point lcm flyers out there – same with the freestyles.
I thought Cal was looking good for 2020, but with Texas really only losing Rooney and Harty, it looks like NCAAs are theirs to lose next year.
The total BLASPHEMY for Jared to leave us off of this list! I mean complete garbage. How could he forget such a big powerhouse like Devry?!? It’s despicable to have a writer that can’t even do his own research! Everybody knows we’ll be getting Yeadon, Dean Farris, and (dare I say) Michael Phelps?! But it’s ok, Jared. We’re fine being the underdog. Let’s do who’s laughing come March!
Apparently Devry never taught me to proofread my messages before sending…
My rationale is that I’m just not sold on this Phelps guy. Can he even swim short course?
Here at Devry we like to take big risks! Our accredited coaching staff knows how to take an unproven long course swimmer and make him into a top-notch short course star! We’ve had some issues with this Bob Bowman guy who thinks he knows what’s best for Michael, but, trust me he doesn’t! Nobody can match the expertise of our coaches! Our training style of VLPPT (Very Long Practice Pace Training) will have Michael at the top of the podium in no time!
Who is the head coach?
Good question Entgegen! Our program is headed by Mike Westphal. Quite a steal in the swimming world and very—how would I say it—“persuasive” in our interview with him.
And I’m guessing you followed Westphal communication guidelines and have the whole conversation recorded right?
What do we look like…rookies? Of course! We’re always one step ahead of the game. At Devry we set the standard and everyone else just follows!
I’m excited to see Caskey work with those flyers at Stanford.
Anyone know LCM 200back times for Lasco and Stokowski . SCY times still confuse me . Sorry
Good question: Lasco is 55.5/2:01.8 in long course back. Stokowski is 53.8/2:02.6 long course back. That’s quite similar to how they stack up in short course – 45.9/1:40.7 for Lasco, 44.9/1:41.3 for Stokowski.
Thank Jared . You deserve a medal of your own 😁
I honestly thought GA would be in Top 5, and Stanford being #1. Stanford would probably be #1 if they combined boys and girls.
Jared’s handling of keyboard warriors is on point, he woke up ready
Shadow boxed the mirror when he woke up this morning
Woke up feeling dangerous.
I taper for the recruiting season comment section
My worry is that the second best men’s swimming program in the country will be the Texas guys that don’t go to conference or NCAAs.
^ this. They will qualify 25-28 next year.
While Texas is going to qualify a lot of guys for NCAAs, we should remember that qualifying isn’t the same as scoring. At NCAAs in 2019, for example, they had 6 guys who made the roster and didn’t score any points.
So, while they might be able to put together a roster of 8 or 9 guys to go to NCAAs that would be more than most teams send, those guys wouldn’t make up a top 10 scoring team.
That’s the point of the day. Further down in the top 25 it may be more about scoring at conference (if you actually have a conference) and qualifying for NCAA’s, but here at the top it’s about points to win the title.
The main benefit to having lots of guys qualifying above the limit is that the guys who go are much more likely to score, and that depth wins championships. It may be that some guys qualify as freshmen and sophomores but never really had a chance to score, but as they keep developing as juniors and seniors they can score. Meanwhile, they’re competing every day agains the best and win a lot of championship rings. Call it the Bama football model.
The question is could they do a split squad and get two top 5 finishes. Probably.
In 2019, where it only took 212 points for 5th place, they almost certainly could have. Cal likely could have too.
In 2018, where it took 347 points, probably not.
2019 was an anomaly scoring-wise.
It’s alright we like being the underdogs
Underdogs as the #2-ranked recruiting class in the entire nation. The “Nobody Believe In Us” dogma runs strong with this group :). Should just note that considering yourself underdogs at #2 means that over the course of four NCAA seasons, anything less than an NCAA title will mean this class arguably underperformed. It’s all perspective.
Who let Dabo Swinney on here???
The real underdogs probably UGA. They have the #2 and #3 but were 6th. Not disagreeing with the ranking but Luca and Jake will be a force to be reckoned with.