2024 WOMEN’S NCAA SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS
- March 20-23, 2024
- Gabrielsen Natatorium, Athens, Georgia
- Short Course Yards (25 yards)
- Meet Central
- Psych Sheets
- SwimSwam Preview Index
- SwimSwam Pick ‘Em Contest
- Live Results
- Live Stream
The Women’s NCAA Championships kick off tonight from Athens, and the question that always comes up pre-meet will try to be determined in this article: How will diving impact the team race?
When we score out the psych sheets, we know things aren’t going to go exactly as projected for a myriad of factors, with things such as taper, nerves, event schedules and everything else playing into how swimmers perform on the big stage.
In diving, there’s a different set of variables at play, as the NCAA qualifiers competed at five different Zone meets last week, meaning there were five different sets of judges. Therefore, comparing scores across multiple meets is far from being an exact, definitive ranking, but it does give us some indication of who the favorites are heading into NCAAs.
Below, find the top 16 scores in each of the three women’s diving events across the five Zone meets (using finals results only), and how they would stack up against one another in an NCAA scoring format.
WOMEN’S 1-METER
Rank | Diver | Zone | Score | Points |
1 | Hailey Hernandez, Texas | D | 666.80 | 20 |
2 | Aranza Vazquez Montano, UNC | B | 629.95 | 17 |
3 | Bridget O’Neil, Texas | D | 628.35 | 16 |
4 | Viviana Del Angel, Minnesota | D | 622.95 | 15 |
5 | Shiyun Lai, Kansas | D | 616.75 | 14 |
6 | Daphne Wils, Penn State | A | 611.30 | 13 |
7 | Lauren Hallaselka, UCLA | E | 609.60 | 12 |
8 | Anne Fowler, Indiana | C | 606.60 | 11 |
9 | Montserrat Lavenant, LSU | D | 606.10 | 9 |
10 | Lena Hentschel, Ohio State | C | 605.50 | 7 |
11 | Elna Widerstrom, Minnesota | D | 605.05 | 6 |
12 | Caroline Brady, Notre Dame | C | 602.85 | 5 |
13 | Camyla Monroy, Florida | B | 600.00 | 4 |
14 | Skyler Liu, Indiana | C | 598.05 | 3 |
15 | Nike Agunbiade, USC | E | 588.60 | 2 |
16 | Elizabeth Kaye, Virginia | A | 587.70 | 1 |
WOMEN’S 3-METER
Rank | Diver | Zone | Score | Points |
1 | Aranza Vazquez Montano, UNC | B | 715.20 | 20 |
2 | Samantha Vear, FSU | B | 696.05 | 17 |
3 | Anne Fowler, Indiana | C | 691.20 | 16 |
4 | Camyla Monroy, Florida | B | 688.60 | 14.5 |
4 | Viviana Del Angel, Minnesota | D | 688.60 | 14.5 |
6 | Lauren Hallaselka, UCLA | E | 685.05 | 13 |
7 | Bridget O’Neil, Texas | D | 677.30 | 12 |
8 | Montserrat Lavenant, LSU | D | 670.40 | 11 |
9 | Daryn Wright, Purdue | C | 668.65 | 9 |
10 | Margo O’Meara, Duke | B | 668.40 | 7 |
11 | Sophie McAfee, Purdue | C | 659.95 | 6 |
12 | Helle Tuxen, LSU | D | 651.30 | 5 |
13 | Aliyah Watson, Duke | B | 649.80 | 4 |
14 | Caroline Brady, Notre Dame | C | 645.95 | 3 |
15 | Skyler Liu, Indiana | C | 644.85 | 2 |
16 | Elizabeth Kaye, Virginia | A | 642.45 | 1 |
WOMEN’S PLATFORM
Rank | Diver | Zone | Score | Points |
1 | Aliyah Watson, Duke | B | 643.30 | 20 |
2 | Skyler Liu, Indiana | C | 638.70 | 17 |
3 | Jordan Skilken, Texas | D | 628.70 | 16 |
4 | Montserrat Lavenant, LSU | D | 627.20 | 15 |
5 | Viviana Del Angel, Minnesota | D | 626.20 | 14 |
6 | Camyla Monroy, Florida | B | 625.50 | 13 |
7 | Else Praasterink, Louisville | C | 624.75 | 12 |
8 | Maycey Vieta, Purdue | C | 617.60 | 11 |
9 | Daryn Wright, Purdue | C | 615.80 | 9 |
10 | Bayleigh Cranford, NC State | B | 613.95 | 7 |
11 | Nike Agunbiade, USC | E | 610.15 | 6 |
12 | Jaye Patrick, Purdue | C | 583.60 | 5 |
13 | Janie Boyle, Ohio State | C | 583.40 | 4 |
14 | Eden Cheng, UCLA | E | 579.30 | 3 |
15 | Tanesha Lucoe, Tennessee | B | 575.65 | 2 |
16 | Maria Osorio Mendoza, Pitt | A | 573.00 | 1 |
The names atop the rankings tell us there is some accuracy here. Texas’ Hailey Hernandez is an Olympian and was 4th on 1-meter last season, so her leading that event checks out. The same goes for Aranza Vazquez Montano, who swept the springboard events at NCAAs last season.
On platform, Duke’s Aliyah Watson leads the Zone scores but was only 36th in the event at the 2023 NCAAs. She did improve 37 points from last year’s Zone performance, but the likes of Montserrat Lavenant, Viviana Del Angel and Skyler Liu would have to be favored over her at NCAAs given they were 2-3-4 in the event last season (Delaney Schenll, now graduated, won).
If the points were distributed based on Zone scores, Texas would lead the field with 64, followed by Minnesota, Indiana, LSU and Purdue.
SCORING THE ZONE RESULTS – TEAM STANDINGS
Rank | Team | 1m | 3m | Platform | Total |
1 | Texas | 36 | 12 | 16 | 64 |
2 | Minnesota | 21 | 14.5 | 14 | 49.5 |
3 | Indiana | 14 | 18 | 17 | 49 |
4 | LSU | 9 | 16 | 15 | 40 |
4 | Purdue | 0 | 15 | 25 | 40 |
6 | UNC | 17 | 20 | 0 | 37 |
7 | Florida | 4 | 14.5 | 13 | 31.5 |
8 | Duke | 0 | 11 | 20 | 31 |
9 | UCLA | 12 | 13 | 3 | 28 |
10 | FSU | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
11 | Kansas | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
12 | Penn State | 13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
13 | Louisville | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
14 | Ohio State | 7 | 0 | 4 | 11 |
15 | Notre Dame | 5 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
15 | USC | 2 | 0 | 6 | 8 |
17 | NC State | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
18 | Virginia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
18 | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
20 | Pitt | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
If we add in the projected diving scores with the psych sheet scores from the swimming events, here are the key takeaways:
- Virginia’s lead over Texas falls from 100 to 38 points for the national title
- Texas extends its lead from three points to 36 points over Florida for 2nd
- USC inches ahead of Stanford for 5th after they were tied based solely on swimming
- Indiana jumps up from 11th to 7th thanks to their 49 diving points
- UNC jumps up from 20th to 16th thanks to their 37 diving points
- UCLA more than doubled their point total, but still only moved up one spot in the team race
- LSU jumps up from 25th to 20th with 40 diving points
- Purdue, Kansas, Penn State and Notre Dame had zero psych sheet swimming points, but move into the standings thanks to diving
- Purdue is the only team in that group to crack the top 25, sitting in 23rd with 40 diving points
PROJECTED SCORES: PSYCH SHEETS + ZONE RESULTS
Rank | Team | Scored Psych | Individual Points | Relay Points | Diving Points |
1 | Virginia | 471.5 | 275.5 | 194 | 2 |
2 | Texas | 433.5 | 233.5 | 136 | 64 |
3 | Florida | 397.5 | 212.5 | 154 | 31.5 |
4 | Tennessee | 296 | 154 | 140 | 2 |
5 | USC | 221.5 | 87.5 | 126 | 8 |
6 | Stanford | 213.5 | 149.5 | 64 | 0 |
7 | Indiana | 208 | 79 | 80 | 49 |
8 | Cal | 201 | 101 | 100 | 0 |
9 | NC State | 182 | 89 | 86 | 7 |
10 | Louisville | 181 | 81 | 88 | 12 |
11 | Ohio State | 171.5 | 68.5 | 92 | 11 |
12 | Georgia | 140 | 102 | 38 | 0 |
13 | Michigan | 118 | 40 | 78 | 0 |
14 | Wisconsin | 84 | 56 | 28 | 0 |
15 | Texas A&M | 72.5 | 46.5 | 26 | 0 |
16 | UNC | 62.5 | 7.5 | 18 | 37 |
17 | Arizona State | 59 | 49 | 10 | 0 |
18 | Minnesota | 58.5 | 9 | 0 | 49.5 |
19 | Duke | 57 | 22 | 4 | 31 |
20 | LSU | 54 | 0 | 14 | 40 |
21 | Auburn | 53 | 13 | 40 | 0 |
22 | UCLA | 46 | 18 | 0 | 28 |
23 | Purdue | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
24 | Alabama | 34 | 12 | 22 | 0 |
25 | Penn | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
26 | FSU | 20 | 3 | 0 | 17 |
27 | VA Tech | 19 | 7 | 12 | 0 |
28 | South Carolina | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
29 | Kansas | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
30 | Penn State | 13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
31 | Pitt | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
32 | Cincinnati | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
33 | Princeton | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
34 | Notre Dame | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
35 | Northwestern | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
36 | California Baptist | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 |
37 | Arizona | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
38 | Nevada, Reno | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
39 | Washington State | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
40 | Liberty | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
41 | Nebraska | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
42 | Akron | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
43 | Arkansas | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
44 | Miami (Ohio) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you for the comprehensive review of the meet!
Very tight! No DQ’s allowed for UVA!
Would be nice if there were no DQs for anyone – this would avoid arguements/debates over – well if “this relay” wasn’t DQ-ed then “this team” would have won….
Texas diving saving them as per usual
And that’s why the sport is called Swimming AND Diving – kind of like Track AND Field.
Thanks for taking my suggestion.
I did this last year…
Why do you do the psych sheet review and analytics before you do the diving assessment? Seems like it is unnecessarily confusing.
The psych sheets are released before the Zone Diving meets even start (or the same day they start).
I really do think Texas has a chance if they are lights out and uva is only okay. I wouldn’t bet on them but I think it’s not a forgone conclusion like many think
UVa has a track record of doing very well at NCAAs whereas Texas, not so much. I do see a chance where Texas can score more points than projected in the relays… but I believe this is UVa’s meet (I am a UT grad and would love to see them win but….UVa has an outstanding program.)