Courtesy of Dr. Keith Bell and Bridger Bell
Swimming at Western Kentucky University died this week. The cause of death was hazing.
While we regret the loss of any collegiate swimming opportunity, thankfully WKU swimming died as a result of hazing before one of its swimmers did. We don’t know of any swimmers who have died as a result of hazing; however, we do know that there is hazing on swim teams that bears striking resemblance to what happened at WKU and also resembles hazing that elsewhere has lead to student deaths.
Let’s stop hazing now before it kills someone’s son or daughter.
Any activity that burdens underclassmen or exempts upperclassmen from a burden can be considered hazing. One school had to end a prior coach’s practice of allowing upperclassmen have underclassmen refill their sodas because it fell under the state’s definition of hazing and was illegal. Such practices — and indeed many forms of initiation — are often deemed “harmless” but perpetuate a culture of hazing and distract from building mission-focused team unity.
Hazing is not a team building exercise, certainly not a good one. Good team building practices are not about coming together to share just any kind of experience. Good team building practices are about the mission. They are about aligning team members to the team’s mission, setting goals consistent with the team mission, and creating an environment that makes the pursuit of excellence and the well-being of the athletes the guiding principles for all team activities.
What do drinking and humiliating newcomers have to do with a team’s mission?
Nothing.
The excuses for hazing are lies. One collegiate swimmer, when confronted with the reality of alcohol hazing on his team responded: “we have it under control,” “we never take it too far,” and, “nobody has ever gotten hurt on our team.”
First, even if that were true (which it isn’t), it doesn’t make the hazing valuable in any way, it doesn’t eliminate the social and psychological harm, it doesn’t make it less illegal, and it doesn’t eliminate the conditions that could so easily lead to someone getting hurt or dying.
What if the next year, or two years, or ten years after you graduate the hazing goes just a little bit further and someone does get hurt or dies? If you ever participated in the hazing tradition, then you have contributed to the circumstances and the culture that led to the tragedy. Even if there is never an immediate tragedy, long-term or delayed consequences may loom.
No one ever gets hurt until someone gets hurt. It’s always okay until it’s not.
Hazing has no proper place among swimming teams. It always does some harm. It doesn’t contribute to swimming excellence, while it does distract from excellence.
For that matter, it has no proper place anywhere. In many states, hazing is not only against the law, but it is against the law even to fail to report hazing if you have firsthand knowledge of it. If you are involved in hazing or if you even know that it is happening and you don’t report it, you could be committing a crime.
Underage drinking is also against the law. Providing alcohol to minors is a jailable offense. “Everyone does it” doesn’t negate the law, nor does it mitigate the consequences when you get caught. At the University of Houston, at least from 2001-2005, all underage athletes signed a contract pledging not to consume alcohol. Those of age (21) pledged not to provide underage students with alcohol, not to consume alcohol in-season, and not to have any alcohol present at team functions (formally organized or informal). Athletes were regularly held accountable for this with suspensions and dismissals. How do your team’s policies and practices compare?
It is not true that “everyone does it,” nor is it true that “it goes on everywhere,” but hazing does still occur on swim teams. It has to stop. No more “rookie nights.” No more “welcome week.”
Swimming is healthful, exciting, and fun. Hazing has no proper place among swim teams. As we have seen in the last few days, hazing can bring disrepute to athletes, coaches and staff, the institutions and communities that house and support swimming programs, and to the sport of swimming itself.
Let’s stop hazing now. Let’s not wait until someone dies.
The world’s first Swimming Psychologist, Dr. Keith Bell is internationally recognized as the foremost expert on performance enhancement in swimming. Dr. Bell has worked directly, as a sports psychologist, with over 400 teams and 15,000 athletes worldwide. Thousands more in and out of swimming have utilized and been helped by his 9 books. Dr. Bell has been the Sports psychologist for U.S., Canadian, Australian, Hong Kong, Fiji, Cayman Islands and New Zealand Olympic and National Teams and has affected top-ranked swimmers throughout the world.
About Bridger Bell
Bridger Bell is in his first year coaching with Johns Hopkins and is also the head coach at St. Paul’s School in Brooklandville, MD. Prior to that, he coached at The Westminster Schools in Atlanta, where his boys and girls teams each won Georgia High School State Championships.
Bell served for six years as the National Director of Collegiate Club Swimming for the American Swimming Association, presiding over its growth from four to sixty-eight teams across the country and holding over 40 regular-season meets, seven regional championships and a national championship each season. Bell has been a competitive swimmer himself all his life and was a USMS National Champion and USMS All-American in the 2-mile cable swim. He was featured as a coach in the July and August 2014 issues of Swimming World Magazine. In addition to high school and now NCAA teams, Bell has coached summer league, collegiate club, USA Swimming, Masters.
Anyone see the screen caps of some of Collin Craig’s text messages to other swimmers?
Link at:
http://www.wbko.com/home/headlines/WKU-Swimmers-Attorney-Tells-Their-Side-Of-The-Story-301224221.html
Colin Craig’s text message:
“Hey can you get a fifth of taka and a six pack of redds for the recruits?”
Colin Craig’s letter to the police:
“Nearly every recruit was taken to parties at the party house and at least offered alcohol without regard to their age or desire.”
Seems like a straight up lie (or at least really misleading of him) to blame “the party house” for offering recruits alcohol when he was the one trying to get it for them.
I don’t understand… does that make it OK?
If a bank robber turns in his partners in crime, nobody is interested in hearing them try and point out that the guy who blew the whistle on their crew was a part of the crew. They still robbed banks.
The interesting part of that link was that they aren’t so much saying they are innocent as trying to shift the conversation to how Craig is ALSO guilty.
That’s a pretty crummy defense.
You’re responding to a point that I didn’t make.
Does it matter to WKU or anyone involved that alleged “victim” Colin Craig is a hypocrite? No, not at all. It may matter to the next team he tries to join however…
I would think more parents and swimmers would be concerned about where the hazers from WKU were going to transfer to. Based on comments from some people in the WKU community, they are pretty righteous in their belief hazing at that or any level is acceptable. I wouldn’t want to risk WKU’s culture infecting my team furthering the possibility of another swim program being suspended.
You concern for other programs are duly noted and misplaced.
Let me get this straight. You are going out of your way to interfere in his transfer options by leaving comments like this. I’d be careful if I were you bossanova. You are sliding down a slippery slope…
Programs looking to sign transfers from WKU should certainly check into them first as best they can to determine whether or not they’d be detrimental to the program. Obviously, some, but not all would be. However, from those text messages (If they’re real–which I assume they are), it’s clear that Colin Craig is interested in giving recruits alcohol on his own volition so he’d fall under ‘detrimental.’
I don’t understand why pointing this out is a slippery slope? Or why I should be careful? I’m simply a guy expressing my opinion on the internet.
I’d be concerned about a kid coming into my program or my kid’s program who engages in inappropriate conduct that rats on his teammates for doing the very things he was doing. I question his judgement and susceptibility to peer pressure, then I question his character for claiming to be the victim of the very conduct in which he engaged!
What kind of person plays victim after partaking in the very activities he complains about in a 10 page police report and lies about witnessing sexual assault?
Dishonorable.
Been coaching for a long time, have had good years and tough years
Observations–
–most of the hazing incidents we hear about have involved alcohol abuse.
–connection with athletes and coaches is a major key in performance/
–I connect most with our athletes and teams that have stayed “out of trouble”…–trust is the issue. Must have trust! everyone makes mistakes–but alcohol abuse leads to big mistakes and big mistakes are not tolerated
–high academic achievement and really fast swimming occurs more frequently from the teams that did not “party hard”. Those on our current team who have improved the most did very little partying.
–the years I have enjoyed coaching the most were ones… Read more »
Seriously? That’s the best you got?
Does anyone else feel like Obama has hazed them for 6 years?
I have read through all the comments and in my personal & professional experience over the last 47 years as both an age-group, college, Masters & marathon swimmer (1968 to present, including a national championship) & a coach (1971 to present), I can genuinely say that I have never experienced that hazing is “harmless” as some in this forum have either intimated or stated. There is an undercurrent of some form of belittling in every hazing incident. I wholeheartedly agree with numerous comments, like Coach’s “if a coach is really opposed to ALL types of hazing, the coach can make sure it doesn’t happen” and also Jim who explains “to the team that we don’t have freshmen, sophomores, juniors &… Read more »
With the number of swimmers, alumni and proudparents out there that are fighting for their right to pick on freshman, one thing is obvious; WKU is not going to be the last school to lose their program for hazing. You do you. It will be just as sad next time it happens as well.
It will certainly happen again. And those alumni, parents, swimmers and supporters will be just as indignant and shocked when it does.
The precedent has been set. ADs around the country now have a minimum standard to suspend a sport for 5 hears and funnel the saved money to the sport of their choosing. And for sure some entitled, selfish, insecure knucklehead trying to impress his daddy or uncle or big bro who swam back in the day will put his need to bully above his program, giving the schools administrators the ammo they need.
But I guess that’s the price you gotta pay to be a broad and not some lame @$$ wuss.
You hit the nail on the head! Thank you!
If they want to actually coach in this sport, their tenure will be very short! As for the parents who defend this behavior, they have no clue what pressure it is to keep your program respected at an institution of higher learning. The administrations are looking for ways to trim the budget and for non-revenue generating sports this would be an easy fix. Bad publicity no matter how good the team travels all the way to the top. How can anyone who cares about their program get sucked into thinking hazing is acceptable.
I’m surprised Bobo hasn’t blamed Republicans for the hazing………..yet.
Jim,
I coached swimming from 1964 through 2010 and still help with a college team. Your comments were right on the money. Hazing does lend itself to oneupmanship and things that are innocent often evolve into something that is not innocent. Thank you for your well thought out comments
It should be simple. The Athletic Department should take the stand that if any hazing occurs in any of its program, it will be eliminated from conference championships and NCAAs for that year. At the beginning of the season have all athletes sign a contract understanding and agreeing to this. The first program violating this contract will pay the price and send a message to the whole school’s athletic department. If it ever happens a second time to that program — Bye-Bye program! Schools that employ this practice should be proud then to promote this practice which lets athletes and their parents know that this truly is a “no-tolerance hazing” school. It will be a deterrent for those who are… Read more »
Go fill my water bottle now, and tonight you must fill my empty soda cup. Would that cost me my NCAA ticket?
If the answer is yes, do you still do it?
Ruling by fear is ALWAYS effective. That should be a real eprit de corps! “Bond with your new teammates, but if you do anything that upsets them, your season will end, all of your hard work will be for nothing and you will have to transfer to another school if you want to swim again!” – “Now, go have fun you crazy kids!”