Swimming at the 2024 Paris Olympics is over, and the U.S. has won the medal table. Going into the final session, Team USA trailed Australia with six golds to seven, but a pair of world records by Bobby Finke and the women’s 4×100 medley relay solidified the U.S.’s position atop the standings for the ninth-straight Olympics.
While the U.S. has been historically dominant in pool swimming at the Olympics, this meet showed the rest of the world is catching up. Through the first four days, all six individual titles contested to that point had been won by European men. The American men’s sole gold came at the 11th hour, thanks to Finke defending his 1500 free title.
Still, it will be a long time before a country starts to close on the United States’ dominating 607 Olympic swimming medals, 265 of which are gold. For reference, Australia is in second with 230 total medals, 76 gold. (Even if you add in the eight medals earned by Australasia, a combined team with Australian and New Zealand athletes from 1908 and 1912, it hardly makes a difference.)
United States of Backstroke
It probably won’t come as a surprise that the stroke the United States has been most dominant in historically is a backstroke event. Prior to Paris, exactly 50% of all Olympic medals in the men’s 100 backstroke belonged to the U.S, with 15 of those being gold.
With the results in Paris, the balance was tipped to 49.4%, but it’s still an impressive result considering that the men’s 100 backstroke is one of the longest standing Olympic events. It has been contested since 1908 with only one absence in 1964.
The 200 back is another similarly dominant event for the U.S. with 43.1% of all medals. This is one event where it appears the world has caught up; an American man missed the podium in Paris for the first time since 1992.
As a final note in the 200 back, Apostolos Christou earned Greece’s first medal in the event with the silver… and Greece’s first medal in a swimming event since 1896.
The Great Equalizer
Across both the men’s and women’s events, the 200 breaststroke is the most likely candidate for another country to surpass the U.S.’s lead in the medal count: 20.8% of medals belong to the women, while only 18.5% of medals belong to the men.
The second place nation on the women’s side stands as the Soviet Union, who won’t be catching up any time soon (13.9%, 16.7% if you add in Russia), but the men look far more vulnerable. Japan is already winning the gold medal count six to five, and has 14.8% of medals of any color.
Kate Douglass won the 200 breast for the American women, while American Record holder Matt Fallon failed to advance to the final.
The 200 breast is also a long-standing Olympic event, making its 24th and 26th performance for women and men respectively in Paris.
Jury Still Out in New Events
The United States has won 50% of medals in the women’s 1500 freestyle, with a catch. Paris was only the second Olympic Games that the event was contested, and only six medals have ever been distributed. Two of them belong to Katie Ledecky.
It’s a similar story in the men’s 800 freestyle, where the U.S. is tied with Italy for most medals. More accurately, Bobby Finke and Gregorio Paltrinieri are tied for the most medals.
While the U.S. does currently have a formidable 1-2 punch between training partners Ledecky and Finke, it would be presumptuous to say the Americans are as dominant in these events as the backstroke discussed earlier.
The 4×100 mixed medley relay is another case with an asterisk. It’s the only event in which the United States does not hold a majority of medals. They missed the podium entirely due to a baffling line-up in Tokyo, but bounced back for gold and a world record in Paris.
The story is still being written for these three events, which are the youngest on the pool swimming schedule with only two Olympic appearances. In second is the women’s 4×200 freestyle relay, which first appeared in 1996.
In Conclusion
While the United States, particularly the men, looked far more vulnerable in Paris than they have in previous years, by the numbers there is no denying the American legacy in the pool.
But the U.S. won single-digit golds at these Olympics, the fewest in their nine year streak atop the table. 19 distinct countries won medals at the Games. All signs point to swimming growing more competitive around the world, which can only be good for the continued growth of the sport.
Per capita, the Aussies have probably been more dominant for a long time. But overall, I don’t see any one country surpassing us, at least for a long time. We’re just too big a country and when you factor in summer league, where everyone gets their start, I believe swimming is the largest participation sport in the country. So while football, basketball, soccer, and baseball are big sports, a lot of kids are exposed to some form of competitive swimming. Our talent pool is huge. What you are probably going to see more of is the athletes/small contingents with random event dominance. I wondered about Ireland having two medalists this games and looked up their clubs. The there are two… Read more »
Phelps and Lochte hid a lot of weaknesses that the US might have had. They were both once-in-a-generation talents that happened to be active at the same time and managed to slot into like 60% of the events on the program. Since they retired, the US has not had anyone who is that versatile.
My 2 cents: a combo of motivation, good coaching and competition makes champions. With the LA Olympics on the horizon, our athletes have motivation. We obviously have great coaching or Marchand, Kos and McIntosh would train elsewhere. And where else is swimming competition so intense on nearly a weekly basis? I believe the US will surpass our now lower expectations in ’28 because a new generation of swimmers will want desperately to emerge as the new PhelpsLedecky. Don’t give up yet!
Question for Aussies. Why do y’all whine about the US having a larger population? (Not in this comment section, but in general) We have like 340 million people while China has 1.4 billion. But do we give a sh**?? Nah we just shut up and beat them. They have a population over 4 times ours, they’ve been caught for cheating countless times, and we still absolutely wreck them on the medal table in every major international meet.
Maybe y’all should take notes. Quit yappin and start swimming faster
China is not a first world country.
More than 3/4 of their population struggle to put food on the table let alone do sport, likewise with India.
If you still unsure of what I mean, look at the sports attendances around the world & you can see the big population countries like India, China, Indonesia & even Brazil (who are football (soccer) crazy) don’t go to sports like the countries in the first world. See below figures on wikipeadia.
If not sure who are first world countries, they are only Nth America (both US & Canada), Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan & Sth Korea.
The US is by far the biggest Population wise for 1st world countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attendance_figures_at_domestic_professional_sports_leagues
I am sure you do realise that a first world country, with the most resources has a significant advantage over a country with a population 14X smaller.
China is not a first world country with unlimited resources like USA
That logic doesn’t really compute. You are not exactly having one person vs a thousand Chinese. It’s still just one Chinese vs one Australian in a meet.
If you calculate the population of people who actually train and have facilities and the income to afford the best athletic training. Australia might have a larger population due to being richer per capita.
And may explain why other countries are improving and catching up because they are much wealthier overall compared to decades ago, albeit not yet as rich as the west.
so finding a relay team out of 330 million is no easier than finding a team from 26 million? Filling an entire team from 330 million. Even the resources thing. The amount of money to support athlete in the US compared to Australia?
Hmm, I think it comes down to size of middle class. The China Gov can’t sponsor too many people. They don’t have enough funds to give everyone a top chance. And why their Olympic Success would probably be dependant on their overall wealth.
If you look at their top swimmers in. China.They tend to go to swimming clubs from richer provinces. Those places can produce great swimmers as they have larger populations of well fed and quality trained people. When it comes down to it, richer countries tend to do well in Olympics especially for sports that are highly technical and need money for mastering the learning curve and afford quality training
Example is Pan zhanle is a great swimmer… Read more »
Whos whining ?
Americans were quaking when Moesha Johnson almost got gold in 10km open water
Remember the hype surrounding Chris Guiliano at the 2024 USA Swimming Olympic Team Trials? Boy, did he fizzle out after the M 4 x 100 FR-R on Day 1 at the 2024 Summer Olympics.
Did he even do the prelims for the 800 free relay?
A number of veterans failed to step up:
Dressel – M 100 FL
Kalisz – M 400 IM
Murphy – M 200 BK
Aside from Luke Hobson in the M 200 FR (bronze), none of the other men in the pool surprised at the 2024 Summer Olympics.
In addition, the male contingent of USA Swimming only won one relay as opposed to three at the 2016 Rio Olympics and two at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics. That’s regression.
I thought USA Swimming hit rock bottom at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships only to fall further into the abyss at the 2024 Summer Olympics.
A comparison of the male contingent at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships, discounting the events (50 BK, 50 BR, 50 FL) not contested at the Summer Olympics, to the 2024 Summer Olympics:
USA Swimming
2023 World Aquatics Championships
Men’s Events
G – 2
S – 7
B – 5
Total – 14
USA Swimming
2024 Summer Olympics
Men’s Events
G – 2
S – 4
B – 3
Total – 9
It’s high time for a Taylor Twellman-esque rant:
What are we doing? What are we doing?
Goodbye Tim and Lindsay!
Tim Hinchey III and his cronies on the Board of Directors have to go. Out the door or thru the window, I don’t care how.
Genuine question – what do they have to do with athletes’ performance
Lol I’ve wondered the same thing and I’m pretty knowledgeable about USAS, maybe they think since Tim is partially to blame for all the financial misdoings of USAS in the past few years, that that has a direct cause to the bad performances. However I do think there need to be big changes in USAS, but maybe firing the CEO isn’t the best idea.
They don’t, but relay names guy won’t engage with actual conversation he’ll just type the same thing over and over
Well, he or she did attempt to provide some data.
This is a great question.
He sets the tone for the organization.
He lacks to inspire a team and hires his inexperienced friends/neighbors. In other words he failed to lead the organization. He floats day to day collecting his paycheck and focused on who on the board he can sway to vote for him. He’s focused on saving his multimillion income per year.
He doesnt care about membership which trickles down to the staff and the membership feels it.
USA swimming CSuite knows membership is not happy while reading surveys. Yet, nothing is done.
He does not care about LSCs, honestly. Coaches talk poorly left and right on the deck about him.
How to you… Read more »
What’s interesting is that USA Swimming is using “we support the Olympic Team” as a counter-narrative to AAU.
I think if you’re going to use that as the main argument for people staying with your organization, then you’ve gotta take it on the chin if people aren’t happy with their performances.
Yes, agreed that is part of it.
Look at how much was spent at trials. Or the loss, rather. Have you explored this?
Maybe looking at that would be a good line of discussion. Did you see the other countries needing to create a light show in a stadium for subpar results?
Look, I appreciate the idea of creating a major swim meet at a stadium. The awareness of competitive swimming to follow.
That said, how long does that stick? How do you plan to measure the results from said energy created from trials? Performances at the Olympics? Increased membership? Viewership, and if so how did that turn into dollars, how many? Not enough.
I’m not against… Read more »
This is a great question.
He sets the tone for the organization.
He lacks to inspire a team and hires his inexperienced friends/neighbors. In other words he failed to lead the organization. He floats day to day collecting his paycheck and focused on who on the board he can sway to vote for him. He’s focused on saving his multimillion income per year.
He doesnt care about membership which trickles down to the staff and the membership feels it.
USA swimming CSuite knows membership is not happy while reading surveys. Yet, nothing is done.
He does not care about LSCs, honestly. Coaches talk poorly left and right on the deck about him.
How to you grow and inspire more… Read more »
This is a great question.
He sets the tone for the organization.
He lacks to inspire a team and hires his inexperienced friends/neighbors. In other words he failed to lead the organization. He floats day to day collecting his paycheck and focused on who on the board he can sway to vote for him. He’s focused on saving his multimillion income per year.
He doesnt care about membership which trickles down to the staff and the membership feels it.
USA swimming CSuite knows membership is not happy while reading surveys. Yet, nothing is done.
He does not care about LSCs, honestly. Coaches talk poorly left and right on the deck about him.
How to you grow and inspire more… Read more »