You are working on Staging2

Kenyon Women, Emory Men Remain First In CSCAA’s February Division III Polls

Courtesy: CSCAA

The College Swimming and Diving Coaches Association of America (CSCAA) released its Division III Swimming & Diving Top 25 Poll today. The Emory University men and Kenyon College women remain at the top of the polls.

Emory tallied ten first-place votes and 296 total points, keeping them in first. Kenyon (286 points) took the remaining top votes and moved up two spots to second. Johns Hopkins (272) is third. Chicago (267) and MIT (249) climbed one place each to round out the top five. Bates (50), Bowdoin (24), and Swarthmore (16) made their way into the rankings this month at 22nd, 24th and 25th, respectively. In all, twenty-seven men’s teams received votes.

The Kenyon women were the unanimous favorite among the committee, earning the maximum of 300 points. Emory (285), Denison (279) and Johns Hopkins (262) remain 2nd, 3rd and 4th – the same positions as January. NYU (254) jumped one spot, putting them back in the top five this month. UC Santa Cruz (24) entered the poll this month at 24th. Thirty-one women’s teams received votes.

You can find a complete list of the rankings at: www.cscaa.org/top25

The rankings are voted on by CSCAA-member coaches and select media. The committee ranks the top 25 teams in the nation based on dual meet strength.

The men’s committee chair is Sean Tedesco (USMMA). Regional chairs include: Brad Bowser (Rowan, Northeast South), Paul Bennett (WPI, Northeast North), Brent Summers (Willamette, Midwest South) and Keith Crawford (Rose Hulman, Central).

The women’s committee chair is Jake Taber (Hope). Regional chairs include: Ben Delia (Franklin & Marshall, Northeast South), Brad Burnham (Bowdoin, Northeast North), Jon Duncan (Southwestern, Midwest South) and Justin Zook (St. Kates, Central).

The final poll is scheduled for release on March 4.

Division III Men

Rk Prv Team Points
1 1 Emory 296
2 4 Kenyon 286
2 3 Johns Hopkins 272
4 5 Chicago 267
5 6 MIT 249
6 2 Denison 242
7 8 NYU 222
8 10 Carnegie Mellon 214
9 12 Pomona-Pitzer 207
10 11 Williams 192
11 13 Tufts 176
12 7 WashU 168
13 9 Claremont-Mudd-Scripps 146
14 19 Rowan 138
15 14 Calvin 135
16 15 TCNJ 133
17 22 Amherst 105
18 16 Franklin & Marshall 94
19 21 SUNY Geneseo 81
20 17 Case Western Reserve 74
21 18 Hope 63
22 NR Bates 50
23 24 Caltech 32
24 NR Bowdoin 24
25 NR Swarthmore 16

Also Receiving Votes

UW-Stevens Point (13), SUNY Brockport (5)

Division III Women

Rk Prv Team Points
1 1 Kenyon 300
2 2 Emory 285
3 3 Denison 279
4 4 Johns Hopkins 262
5 6 NYU 254
6 5 Tufts 235
7 7 Chicago 222
8 9 MIT 214
9 8 Pomona-Pitzer 210
10 10 Williams 199
11 11 Claremont-Mudd-Scripps 174
12 12 WashU 160
13 13 Bates 153
14 14 Carnegie Mellon 148
15 15 Saint Kate’s 144
16 16 Hope 115
17 17 Trinity (TX) 95
18 18 Wheaton (MA) 93
19 20 Case Western Reserve 88
20 19 Swarthmore 76
21 21 Amherst 63
22 23 SUNY Geneseo 33
23 24 Calvin 32
24 NR UC Santa Cruz 24
25 22 Washington & Lee 15

Also Receiving Votes

Albion(13), Bowdoin (7), Colby (3), Gettysburg (2), Franklin & Marshall (1), DePauw (1)

Men’s Regional Rankings:

Central: 1. Kenyon 2. Chicago 3. Denison 4. Calvin 5. Case Western 6. Hope 7. UW-Stevens Point 8. Gustavus Adolphus 9. UW-Eau Claire 10. Carthage
Northeast-North: 1. MIT 2. New York University 3. Williams 4. Tufts 5. Amherst 6. Bates 7. Bowdoin 8. Colby 9. U.S. Merchant Marine Academy 10. U.S. Coast Guard Academy
Northeast-South: 1. Carnegie Mellon 2. Rowan 3. TCNJ 4. Franklin & Marshall 5. SUNY-Geneseo 6. Swarthmore 7. Gettysburg 8. RIT 9. Ithaca 10. Stevens
West Midwest: 1. Emory 2. Johns Hopkins 3. Pomona-Pitzer Colleges 4. Washington University (MO) 5. Claremont-Mudd-Scripps 6. California Institute of Technology 7. California Lutheran 8. UC-Santa Cruz 9. Whitworth 10. Birmingham Southern

Women’s Regional Rankings:

Central: 1. Kenyon 2. Denison 3. Chicago 4. Saint Catherine 5. Hope 6. Case Western 7. Calvin 8. Albion 9. DePauw 10. Wooster
Northeast-North: 1.New York University 2. Tufts 3. MIT 4. Williams 5. Bates 6. Wheaton College (MA) 7. Amherst 8. Bowdoin 9. Colby 10. WPI
Northeast-South: 1. Carnegie Mellon 2. Swarthmore 3. SUNY-Geneseo 4. Gettysburg 5. Franklin & Marshall 6. Ursinus 7. Rowan 8. TCNJ 9. Drew 10. Rochester
West Midwest: 1. Emory 2. Johns Hopkins 3. Pomona-Pitzer Colleges 4. Claremont-Mudd-Scripps 5. Washington University 6. Trinity University (TX) 7. UC-Santa Cruz 8. Washington & Lee 9. Mary Washington 10. Rhodes

Men’s Poll Committee

Justin Anderson, Mary Washington; Erica Belcher, NYU; Paul Bennett, WPI; Brad Bowser, Rowan; Peter Casares, Bates; Jennifer Cournoyer, Norwich; Keith Crawford, Rose Hulman; Paul Dotterweich, SUNY Geneseo; David Dow, TCNJ; Rob Harrington, Wooster; Gwynn Harrison, Bridgewater; Sarah James, Southwestern; Michael Kroll, Buffalo State; Pat Smith, Westminster; Brent Summers, Willamette; Sean Tedesco, U.S. Merchant Marine Academy; Jason Weber, Chicago; Seth Weidmann, Carthage; Braden Keith, SwimSwam; David Rieder, Swimming World.

Women’s Poll Committee

Greg Brown, Gettysburg; Brad Burnham, Bowdoin; Jay Daniels, Kalamazoo; Ben Delia, Franklin & Marshall; Jon Duncan, Southwestern; Paul Flinchbauch, Berry; John Geissinger, Hamilton; Katie McArdle, Dickinson; Chris Mhyre, Puget Sound; Shannon O’Brien, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Anne Ryder, Wisconsin-Eau Claire; Meg Sisson French, MIT; Jake Taber, Hope; Mike Tubb, Susquehanna; Jason Weber, Chicago; Toby Wilcox, Birmingham Southern; Justin Zook, St. Kate’s; Braden Keith, SwimSwam; David Rieder, Swimming World.

About the CSCAA

Founded in 1922, the College Swimming and Diving Coaches Association of America (CSCAA) – the first organization of college coaches in America -is a professional organization of college swimming and diving coaches dedicated to serving and providing leadership for the advancement of the sport of swimming & diving at the collegiate level.

31
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

31 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
THEO
2 years ago

Kristin Cornish joining mid-way thru the season to JHU is quite helpful. (1:49 / 4:48 / 16:25 free)

still don’t think they break into top 3, but maybe

Ferb
Reply to  THEO
2 years ago

Chicago’s diving will keep them out of the top 5.

THEO
2 years ago

I thought JHU men had a chance to shake things up this year and win, but idk, Emory is deep as the damn ocean this year. I can’t even keep track of all the good swimmers on that team. They’re A-tier guys all got cuts in the fall and are focused purely on NCAAs, but they’ve had a wave of more B-tier people throw down more (likely/projected) cuts recently, and we haven’t even done UAAs yet. And I think JHU is done competing between now and NCAA, so their roster is locked in as is, and I think too thin to win. I still think we might have a meet that is in the margins of a relay DQ, which… Read more »

Say's Phoebe
Reply to  THEO
2 years ago

JHU has one more meet on Feb 19th, but for the most part their roster is set.

If you run the database today Hopkins will have 17 swimmers in at NCAAs in individual events. 13 of those swimmers (13!) are on the 7 line or higher.

Arena is on the 10 line (3:57.21 4IM), McGough is on the 11 (1:50.10 2IM), and Surprenant is on the 12 (1:48.93 2fly). I think that Fitch will probably swim the 50 free instead of the 2fly (same day as the 100 back), so Surprenant is really on the 11 line (and Seymour 1:47.63 is on the 4 not the 5).

Hughes is on the 14 line (1:38.99 2free) but he is… Read more »

THEO
Reply to  Say's Phoebe
2 years ago

Good analysis! I do not think Arena, McGough, or Suprenant will qualify with those times. There’s a chance, but the 4IM and 2fly are slower than qual time in 2020, and the 2IM is like .05 faster, so I assume none will make it this time. So yeah hard to bet on a team with “only” 13-14 entrants when I can pretty much assume Emory will hit 18 this year with the talent that they have.

Ferb
2 years ago

Andrew Karpenko should be ranked higher.

Oops, I meant Swarthmore.

Matt
Reply to  Ferb
2 years ago

Eh

Nathan Smith
2 years ago

Three things that make D3 rankings difficult:

  1. There are so many D3 schools.
  2. There is a bigger variety in how teams structure their training blocks since you can only practice 19 weeks out of the year.
  3. The NESCAC is weird.
ACC
Reply to  Nathan Smith
2 years ago

4) A lot of schools don’t care at all about how fast they go in dual meets.

Hannah
Reply to  Nathan Smith
2 years ago

NESCAC swimmer here: can confirm our conference is hard to rank because everyone has different attitudes towards suiting up midseason. Normally Williams wouldn’t be on here because they wouldn’t have suited up yet.

Anonymous
Reply to  Nathan Smith
2 years ago

NESCAC is hard to judge given most of the Northeast has been locked down more than the rest of the country.

Big Mac #1
2 years ago

Braden, what are your rankings?

swimswamswum
Reply to  Braden Keith
2 years ago

That definitely helps but wow the Northeast Women’s rankings are so off base. Williams is too low, Wheaton is too high, and Bowdoin beat Bates head to head. Amherst is a little hard to place given no head to heads with the group but their times and margin of victory over other teams these teams have been against they should be ahead of Bates/Bowdoin/Wheaton. Seems to me like people are just looking at the fastest times of the season and calling it a day, which benefits the teams that do mid season invites.

Ferb
Reply to  swimswamswum
2 years ago

If you can hang on for like another 6 weeks, there will be a meet to sort it all out.

Hannah
Reply to  swimswamswum
2 years ago

Bates will beat Bowdoin at NESCACs. They’re close in a duel meet setting but not a conference one. On an NCAA level it’s harder to say. Colby, which got a lot of votes here, lost to Middlebury in a duel meet. They will probably lose to them at conference. But Colby will crush Middlebury at NCAA (if any Middlebury swimmers even make it) because Colby has two nationally ranked swimmers and Middlebury has none.

Ice Golem
2 years ago

Rankings after conferences this weekend would be more enlightening.
so, WE DO NOT CARE

swimapologist
Reply to  Ice Golem
2 years ago

D3 swimmers: “we want more D3 stuff!!!!!”
D3 swimmers after D3 stuff is published: “NONE OF THIS MATTERS WE DON’T CARE”

The lack of self awareness in the comments of every D3 article is astounding.

Nathan Smith
Reply to  swimapologist
2 years ago

Don’t act like the “rankings don’t matter!” comment that misunderstands the CSCAA poll isn’t a classic mainstay on every division’s ranking articles.

Last edited 2 years ago by Nathan Smith
N80m80
2 years ago

Geneseo is too high

N. Sheldon
2 years ago

It appears that the committee finally stopped ranking Denison’s men based on historical NCAA performances. Their team has severely underperformed this year (Exhibit A being the fact they only have one swimmer breaking 1:40 in the 200 free), and I don’t see any way their team gets top 5 at NCAAs this year. It’s about time the committee ranks them appropriately.

Dressel_42.8
Reply to  N. Sheldon
2 years ago

Denison is faster than Kenyon in all 5 relays so far and 9 of 13 individual events. Yet Kenyon ranked #2 and you somehow think Denison won’t be top 5. #GoodJob

ACC
Reply to  N. Sheldon
2 years ago

The CSCAA rankings are about who would win in a dual meet and Kenyon men beat Denison men 208.5-91.5.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »